Blog

Blog – Killing Chinese Life Sciences, Part IV: Poison “Bills,” Side Effects, and Immunizations

In fall 2024, the BIOSECURE Act, which blocked the United States (US)’s government’s use of goods and services from Chinese biotech companies, sailed through the US House of Representatives only to become stalled in the US Senate.[1]  This is only one in a series of US government (USG) efforts to…

Killing Chinese Life Sciences, Part III: Sequencing the DNA of US-China Ties

On September 9, the BIOSECURE Act, which this blog series has been covering since March, passed by a huge majority in the United States (US) House of Representatives. The essence of the act is the termination of direct and indirect US government dealings with five Chinese biotech companies (Complete Genomics,…

Killing Chinese Life Sciences, Part II-Birth, Adolescence, and Adulthood

The most recent and prominent United States (US) attempt to limit cooperation with Chinese life science businesses has stalled, but is hardly dead.  Current Speaker of the House Mike Johnson said he intends to have the BIOSECURE Act signed into law before the end of 2024.[1]  Irrespective of the impasse,…

Killing Chinese Life Sciences, Part I: Poisoning WuXi AppTec and its Kin

In January 2024, Congressman Mike Gallagher, the Chair of the United States (US) House Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, introduced the “Biosecure Act,” which prohibits the US government (USG) from “procuring or obtaining biotechnology equipment or services produced or provided by a biotechnology company of concern,” participating in a…

The BRI is Dead? Long Live the BRI? Part IV-Bad Flail at the Rail(way) or How Not to Confront the BRI

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has generated so much commentary that it is conceivable that if one printed out all the relevant pages and laid them end-to-end the length might approach that of all the railway track laid under the aegis of the BRI![i]  Further commentary seems even more…

The BRI is Dead? Long Live the BRI?, Part III – The Cracked Belts and Forked Roads Blocking Realization of the BRI Dream

China, as you would expect, Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) participants and proponents, and even data support some of the positive sentiment in, if not the logic of, the previous blog in this four-part series on the future of the BRI, which highlighted numerous factors likely to continue propelling the…

The BRI is Dead? Long Live the BRI?, Part II- Accelerants Allover with Sporadic Retardants

My last blog highlighted the debate raging about the health of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).[1]  It also reviewed the economic and political rationales for China’s ambitious scheme.  This blog takes the position that the BRI is neither dead nor on life-support.  Such claims ignore the array of enduring…

The BRI is Dead? Long Live the BRI? Part I: Present at the Creation

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which consists of two main components, the sea-focused Maritime Silk Road Initiative (MSRI) and the land-focused Silk Road Economic Belt (SREB), came into being in 2013.[1]  Since Chinese President Xi Jinping launched the MSRI and the SREB, there has been considerable positive and negative…

China and IPR, part IV-Innovating Chinese IPR Improvements

This is the last in a four-part series that has looked inter alia at debates surrounding China’s protection of foreign intellectual property (IP) rights (IPR), detailed China’s problematic fulfillment of its IPR commitments, and examined various factors potentially driving China’s poor compliance with its IPR obligations.  The focus of this…

China and IPR, part III-Caring about Causes

  In my last blog, I detailed China’s continuing shortcomings with protecting intellectual property (IP) rights (IPR) and the emergence of new challenges.  The question arises as to why these problems persist even though it has been more than 20 years since China joined the World Trade Organization (WTO), is…